Will the Arrival of Shale Finally End the Peak Oil Debate?
|
When assessing the potential of shale, there is perhaps no better example to use than the United States.
One of the largest consumers of energy in the world – much of it imported – the country continues to rely heavily on fossil fuels to power its economy, which is still recovering from the global economic downturn that struck in 2008
As a result, it is also one of the countries most concerned about the peak oil debate.
Thirty of the 42 largest oil producing companies in the world have now seen production peak or plateau. The United States itself has seen domestic production decline steadily for the past 40 years, despite the investment being ploughed into exploration and production.
Indeed, estimates from the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO) suggest the peak of regular oil production was hit in 2005, with the peak of all liquids due to be reached in 2015.
However, in recent years the discovery of shale gas has provided it with the opportunity to perhaps mitigate some of the consequences caused when production can simply no longer keep up with demand.
Shale Gas
In its latest Annual Energy Outlook, the United States Energy Information Administration (EIA) has more than doubled its estimates for recoverable shale gas resources.
Between 2006 and 2010, shale gas production experienced a 48 per cent average yearly increase, and extraction is expected to continue to grow at significant rates, increasing three-fold between 2009 and 2025.
The figures are indeed all positive on the surface, but the EIA stresses they are liable to change and "the estimates embody many assumptions that might prove to be untrue in the long term."
Estimates included in the outlook are based on the assumption that production is to continue at current levels, although "experience to date has shown that production rates from neighbouring shale gas wells can vary by as much as a factor of three".
Indeed, how long-term production rates from shale gas wells vary is as yet undocumented, as many of the plays were discovered relatively recently.
What's more, production has so far generally been confined to the areas which are known to have the highest rates, and levels are likely to drop when operations move away from these areas.
All this would suggest that while currently it's believed shale gas could meet domestic gas demand in the United States for the next 100 years, this is likely to change.
The Peak Oil Debate
As well as the analysis laid out by the EIA, there are plenty would doubt that shale gas will be such a game changer as many are predicting. There are even fewer who believe it will put an end to the peak oil debate, if reports are to be believed.
Making his keynote address at the ASPO conference, Dr James Schlesinger noted: "Shale gas, which is apparently coming in abundance (but is not, of course, oil) may somewhat alleviate the pressures on liquid fuels.
"But in general we must expect to get along without what has been our critical energy source in expanding the world's economy for more than half a century."
It is essential to remember the economic arguments when considering the peak oil debate.
The majority of industrial nations rely heavily on oil, in particular for fuel, which shale gas will quite simply not be able to replace. However, shale gas can make a significant contribution to the economy in the minds of some.
Speaking at a recently peak oil conference in Denver, Peter Dea, former president of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, said: "I truly believe that natural gas is the common thread of the economy, the environment and energy security."
The general consensus, however, is that the peak oil debate has not been put to bed with the rise of shale gas.
-
Data Management Q & A - Just What Is Most Important? -
The Santos Basin - An Offshore Klondike? -
More British Tax Increases - Is This A Bridge Too Far For North Sea Oil? -
4 ways in which Local Content can lead to local contentment -
The Metals And Minerals Sector: An Underexplored Gold Mine For Local Content? -
Is The Oil & Gas Industry Serious About Asset Integrity? -
What Are The Prospects For Arctic Oil And Gas Drilling? -
Addressing National Concerns Over SCADA security -
How Will BP's Macondo Lawsuits Change The Relationship Between Operators And Service Companies? -
SPOTLIGHT: Contract Risk Management In Iraq - Changing Legislation And Regulations
* = required.
|
|
So what exactly is the definition of the Peak Oil (or peak whatever)? Is it that half the total amount of the resource in existence has been harvested? Is it that half of the total amount of the resource that ever will be harvested, is harvested. Is it the presence of a plateau in production (if so for what period of time must the plateau persist)? Is it that production reduces irreversably (if so does it matter that an alternative supply of the utility to the commodity is supplanting it or that political actors are causal in the reduction)? This notion of Peak Whatever is looking very imprecise. It's reminiscent of the global warming mumbo jumbo, and before that environmentalism in general, and before that pretty much every form of socialist bogey-man potty threat dreamed up to convince people that "there be dragons a-comin'" and the "gummints gotta do summint 'bout tit." Imprecise to the point of deceptive. An old rule in trading is never to attempt to pick the peaks or the troughs. There are far too many unknowns and far too many influences in the market to make the approach succcessful. Sure, if you try you might get one or two right by dumb luck, but you'll consume far more online loans getting it wrong the rest of the time. There are better strategies to apply. "Science" advisors and self-interested mercantilists have much to learn.
|
|
|
it should - the challenge has never been the fact that oil and gas is especially scarce, it's just that the accessibility profile of it changes. we all know the age of 'easy oil' is over, but with new discoveries (and new economic scenarios) bringing shale, ultra deepwater and arctic reserves into play, we have more than enough reserves for this and future generations
|
-
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ -
Contributor: Tom Tugend -
Contributor: Dr. Douglas Southgate -
Contributor: Gary Slagel -
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ -
Contributor: Asdza Nadleehe -
Contributor: Asdza Nadleehe -
Contributor: Asdza Nadleehe -
Contributor: Asdza Nadleehe -
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ News -
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ News -
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ -
Contributor: Oil & Gas IQ
-
Presenter: George Jugovic -
Presenter: Oil & Gas IQ




Replies (0)
Not a member? Sign Up
Reasons for Joining
Address your challenges through knowledge sharing with peers from our global network of specialists.
Benchmark your business initiatives with the who's who in the field.
Hear from industry pioneers how to maximize ROI in today's challenging economy.
And best of all It's FREE!