Oil & Gas Pipeline Explosion: Federal Diaster or Example of Corporate Greed?
In California, the governor, Arnold Schwarzeneger, is asking President Obama to declare a pipeline explosion a federal disaster. This would give federal funds to California so that they can clean up the damage in San Bruno caused by the explosion–damage that Schwarzeneger estimated to be over $10 million dollars.
However, watch group TURN (The Utility Reform Network) claims that Pacific Gas & Electric, the company responsible for the faulty pipeline, had promised to replace the pipeline a year ago, but never did. Additionally TURN said Pacific Gas & Electric asked for $5 million for this project, which the gas company then spent on "higher priority projects."
Four people were killed in the explosion, which happened on September 9. Others are still missing. Something has to be done.
The question is, though, is this a federal disaster? Should the US government be responsible for cleaning up this mess?
I say, yes, the government should step in and help California. But after that, it must take action against the gas company that chose to take no action. This diaster could have been avoided. And Pacific Gas & Electric should be penalized for not fixing the faulty pipeline a year ago.
But the government should not stop there. There need to be regulations for all oil and gas companies. And consequences. Real consequences. Unless there are, corners will still be cut to save money. And lives will still be lost.
What’s your opinion on the subject?
By Jessica Livingston
Want to learn more? Read the latest Oil & Gas Industry analysis now.
- The Top 10 Oil & Gas Companies in the World
- 50 Oil & Gas People You NEED To Follow On Twitter
- Oil & Gas Industry: An Introduction
- Oil and Gas Production - An Introduction
- Oil and Gas Technology: The Future Is Now
FPSO Resource Centre: Introduction to Floating Production Storage and Offloading
Have Your Say
Rate this feature and give us your feedback in the comments section below